In a striking commentary, Tucker Carlson has now reportedly accused President Donald Trump of being “complicit” in the recent Israeli airstrikes against Iran, describing the situation as potentially leading to “all-out war.”
Carlson’s remarks came in what he termed the “final newsletter” from his media network, published shortly after Israel launched airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities and military bases.
The newsletter highlighted the gravity of the strikes, which were condemned by Iran as a “declaration of war.” Carlson outlined the events leading to the current crisis, stating that Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi had threatened to “destroy” any country that attacked his government’s nuclear capabilities.
He warned that the consequences of these hostilities would soon be felt globally.
Carlson was particularly critical of Trump’s reaction to the strikes, noting that while the president praised Israel’s military actions, the U.S. had played a significant role in enabling these developments through years of financial and military support.
“While the American military may not have physically perpetrated the assault, years of funding and sending weapons to Israel undeniably place the U.S. at the center of these events,” he wrote.
This assertion raises questions about the accountability of American leaders in foreign policy decisions.
The newsletter also touched on the implications for upcoming negotiations with Iran. Carlson expressed skepticism about how the Israeli strikes would affect diplomatic efforts, particularly the scheduled talks involving U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff.
“Despite being complicit in the act of war, the president hopes last night’s events will help his ongoing nuclear negotiations with Iran,” he stated, questioning how such an approach would benefit U.S. interests.
Carlson’s comments reflect a broader unease among some conservatives regarding America’s role in the Middle East.
He criticized the notion that military action could simply be justified under the guise of protecting American interests, urging for a more nuanced conversation about the implications of such decisions.
“It’s worth taking a step back and wondering how any of this helps the United States,” he concluded, noting the lack of clear benefits from the escalating conflict.
As tensions between the U.S., Israel, and Iran continue to rise, Carlson’s newsletter serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in international relations and the potential repercussions of military engagement.
His critique of Trump not only underscores the fractures within conservative circles but also highlights the urgent need for a reassessment of U.S. foreign policy in a rapidly changing geopolitical landscape.
[READ MORE: Second Federal Judge Rules Against Trump]
