The House Ethics Committee revealed Monday that it has significantly expanded its investigation into Cory Mills, authorizing more than 20 subpoenas and reaching out to dozens of witnesses as it examines a series of allegations ranging from dating violence to potential campaign finance violations.
In a joint statement, Committee Chair Michael Guest and ranking member Mark DeSaulnier said the investigatory subcommittee expects to gather additional documents and testimony in the weeks ahead, signaling that the inquiry is far from over.
The Ethics Committee, historically known for operating behind closed doors, has taken the unusual step of publicly updating the status of its investigation. The shift toward greater transparency comes as Congress faces mounting scrutiny over allegations of misconduct among its members, particularly those involving personal behavior and ethical standards.
Mills has come under increasing pressure in recent weeks, with some lawmakers calling for his resignation or expulsion. That pressure intensified following the departures of Eric Swalwell and Tony Gonzales, both of whom resigned last month amid separate allegations of misconduct. Nancy Mace has been among the most vocal critics, introducing a resolution on April 20 seeking Mills’s expulsion from the House.
At the center of the investigation are multiple allegations related to Mills’s personal relationships. One former girlfriend obtained a restraining order against him last fall, citing harassment. Another woman, who was reportedly dating Mills at the same time, initially told police she had been the victim of a domestic assault in February 2025 before later recanting her account.
While Mills was neither arrested nor charged in connection with that incident, the matter has resurfaced in the public eye. A report by The Washington Post described body camera footage in which the woman showed police bruises on her arms and marks on her face. The Ethics Committee confirmed that this episode is part of its ongoing review.
In its statement, the committee emphasized that a decision by law enforcement not to bring charges does not necessarily equate to a finding of innocence or the absence of wrongdoing. The panel pointed specifically to the Metropolitan Police Department’s handling of the case, noting that its conclusions do not preclude further examination by congressional investigators.
The probe also extends to a separate legal matter involving a court-issued injunction in October 2025. That order restricted Mills’s ability to contact a woman and barred him from coming within 500 feet of her home or workplace, including limitations on social media interactions. The committee said it is reviewing the circumstances surrounding that injunction as part of its broader inquiry.
Committee leaders stressed that the investigation will proceed with careful attention to due process, as well as the confidentiality and safety of witnesses. They added that any findings will be released publicly in accordance with House rules once the review is complete.
As the investigation unfolds, the case highlights ongoing concerns about accountability and conduct within Congress. At a time when public trust in institutions remains under pressure, the Ethics Committee’s actions suggest a growing willingness to confront allegations directly—even as the process itself remains measured and deliberate.
[READ MORE: Trump Launches Moms.gov, Touts Drug Price Push While Taking Aim at Media Critics]
