President Donald Trump’s top economic adviser is raising concerns about the leadership of the Federal Reserve, suggesting that a change at the central bank could help stabilize both markets and Washington’s increasingly tense political climate.
During a Monday appearance on CNBC, Kevin Hassett took aim at Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, accusing him of “creating political conflicts” that, in his view, go beyond the Fed’s intended role.
Speaking on Squawk Box, Hassett expressed optimism about the anticipated confirmation of Kevin Warsh, who has been nominated by Trump to replace Powell. Hassett argued that markets may already be responding positively to the prospect of new leadership at the Fed, suggesting that investors are anticipating a more measured and less politically entangled approach.
“I think there’s an underappreciated reason why markets are doing so well,” Hassett said, pointing to expectations that the Federal Reserve could soon be led by someone he described as more “level-headed” and less inclined to engage in conflicts outside the institution’s core mission.
Hassett also addressed ongoing scrutiny surrounding Powell, noting that the Federal Reserve’s own inspector general is currently reviewing issues related to the renovation of the Fed’s headquarters. He emphasized that the inquiry is being conducted internally, pushing back against suggestions that the White House is interfering with the Fed’s independence.
“It’s not like the White House is disrespecting the independence of the Fed,” Hassett said, adding that the situation may ultimately provide a pathway for Powell to step down, depending on the outcome of the review.
According to Hassett, a possible resolution could emerge if the inspector general’s report is released soon and Powell is satisfied with its findings. In that scenario, he suggested, Powell may choose to leave his position voluntarily, potentially clearing the way for new leadership at a critical moment for the U.S. economy.
The scrutiny of Powell has not been limited to internal reviews. He was also the subject of a federal investigation related to the Federal Reserve’s headquarters renovation project and statements made to Congress. While the Department of Justice dropped its investigation last month, the matter has not entirely faded from view.
Jeanine Pirro, who oversaw the case, indicated that authorities remain prepared to revisit the issue if new information comes to light. She warned that a criminal investigation could be restarted if warranted by future developments.
The situation places the Federal Reserve at the center of a broader debate about governance, accountability, and the proper boundaries between economic policy and politics. For many observers, the controversy highlights the delicate balance the Fed must maintain as it navigates both market expectations and public scrutiny.
At a time when economic concerns continue to weigh on Americans, leadership at the nation’s central bank carries heightened importance. While markets may respond to signals of stability or change, the underlying question remains whether shifting personnel alone can address deeper challenges facing the economy.
As discussions around Powell’s future unfold, the episode serves as a reminder that decisions made in Washington—whether about economic policy or leadership—often ripple far beyond the capital. And in an environment where global uncertainties persist, the pressure to avoid unnecessary conflict, whether political or otherwise, continues to shape the national conversation.
[READ MORE: Trump Enlists Postal Service in Push to Tighten Mail-In Voting Rules]
