Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger on Monday signed legislation eliminating state property tax exemptions for several organizations tied to the Confederacy, marking a significant shift in how the Commonwealth treats groups associated with its Civil War past.
The measure, known as HB167, passed earlier this year through the Democratic-controlled legislature, clearing the Virginia House by a 62-35 vote and the Senate by a narrower 21-17 margin. The law specifically removes tax-exempt status from entities including the Virginia Division of the United Daughters of the Confederacy and the Confederate Memorial Literary Society, among others with similar affiliations.
The United Daughters of the Confederacy, founded in 1894, describes itself as a nonprofit organization dedicated to honoring ancestors who served in the Confederate military or contributed to the Southern war effort. According to its own materials, the group works to preserve Confederate monuments and collect historical records related to the Civil War, a conflict that continues to cast a long shadow over the nation’s identity and political debates.
The organization maintains a wide geographic footprint, with divisions spanning multiple states, from Alabama to California and Washington, D.C. Its headquarters sits in Richmond, one of two cities in Virginia that served as Confederate capitals during the war, alongside Danville. Financial disclosures show that in 2025, the group reported more than $2.1 million in revenue, over $1.1 million in expenses, and assets totaling $15.8 million.
Supporters of the legislation argue the move reflects a broader effort to reevaluate public support for organizations connected to the Confederacy. State Del. Alex Askew, the bill’s sponsor, praised Spanberger’s decision, calling it “an important step forward for Virginia” in a statement following the signing.
Critics, however, warn the law raises deeper questions about fairness and the role of government in determining which historical narratives receive public support. UDC President General Julie N. Hardaway sharply criticized the measure after it passed the House, describing it as “viewpoint discrimination” that targets organizations based on their perspective.
Hardaway argued the legislation could set a troubling precedent, suggesting it may open the door for other historical institutions to lose tax-exempt status in the future. She questioned whether such actions might eventually extend beyond Confederate-linked groups to other entities, including museums or even religious organizations, if they fall out of favor politically.
At its core, the debate highlights the enduring tensions surrounding the legacy of the Civil War, a conflict that cost countless lives and left scars that have yet to fully heal. While lawmakers seek to address what they view as outdated or inappropriate public support, opponents caution against using state power to reshape historical interpretation.
The decision underscores how, more than a century later, the echoes of that war continue to influence modern policy. And as Virginia moves forward with the new law, the broader national conversation over history, memory, and the limits of government authority shows no signs of fading.
[READ MORE: Trump Pushes GOP Unity on Surveillance Bill Despite Past Grievances]
