MSNBC host Jen Psaki is reportedly urging Democrats to take a more grounded approach when it comes to calls for removing Donald Trump from office, pouring cold water on renewed chatter surrounding the 25th Amendment and its use as a political tool.
Appearing Thursday on Stephen A. Smith’s Straight Shooter program, Psaki addressed growing frustration within segments of the left, where some have floated the idea of invoking the constitutional provision to oust the president. But rather than encouraging that line of thinking, Psaki made clear she sees it as a distraction from more realistic political efforts.
“I think there are times… sometimes it’s like not constructive,” Psaki said, acknowledging she does not agree with every argument coming from her own side of the political aisle. Her remarks reflected a broader concern that Democrats may be spending too much time focusing on outcomes that are unlikely to materialize, rather than engaging in strategies that could actually move the needle.
While Psaki emphasized that she does not object to individuals expressing support for the 25th Amendment in principle, she was blunt about its prospects. “It’s not going to happen,” she said, questioning why so much attention continues to be devoted to the idea. In her view, the repeated focus on a scenario with little chance of success risks undermining more productive conversations.
The comments come as tensions remain high in Washington, where political battles often escalate into calls for extraordinary measures. Yet Psaki’s remarks suggest a recognition, even among critics of the president, that not every political disagreement warrants turning to constitutional mechanisms designed for extreme circumstances.
Her perspective also highlights a recurring challenge within partisan politics: the temptation to pursue symbolic victories rather than practical ones. By labeling the 25th Amendment discussions as “not constructive,” Psaki appears to be cautioning against rhetoric that may energize a base but ultimately fails to produce tangible results.
At the same time, her comments subtly underscore a broader issue that extends beyond any single party. In an era marked by constant political conflict, the impulse to escalate—whether through dramatic legislative proposals or sweeping constitutional arguments—can overshadow more measured approaches. That dynamic, critics argue, risks deepening divisions without resolving underlying problems.
Psaki’s remarks did not delve into specific policy disputes or ongoing conflicts, but the backdrop of national and international tensions looms large over the political landscape. In such an environment, calls for decisive action can quickly morph into demands for drastic measures, even when the path forward is far from clear.
By pushing back on the 25th Amendment narrative, Psaki is effectively calling for a recalibration among the far-left—one that prioritizes realism over rhetoric. Whether that message resonates with Democratic voters remains to be seen, but it reflects a growing acknowledgment that political energy may be better spent on achievable goals.
[READ MORE: Trump Declares Israel “Prohibited” From Striking Lebanon as Strait of Hormuz Reopens]
