A Utah judge has reportedly found a prosecutor in the murder case involving the death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in civil contempt after determining he violated a court order by speaking publicly about evidence in the high-profile case.
The ruling came during a virtual hearing, where Judge Tony Graf Jr. announced that Deputy Utah County Attorney Christopher Ballard was being held in civil contempt for discussing a bullet fragment recovered from Kirk’s body with members of the media.
The civil contempt finding allows the court to impose sanctions designed to compel compliance with its order. According to the ruling, those penalties could include daily fines, wage garnishment or jail time until Ballard complies with the judge’s directive.
Tyler Robinson, 23, has been charged with murder in connection with the fatal shooting of Kirk on a Utah college campus last September. Robinson has not yet entered a plea in the case.
CNN senior correspondent Josh Campbell reported that Judge Graf had previously issued a gag order prohibiting both the prosecution and defense from speaking publicly about the case in an effort to avoid prejudicing potential jurors.
According to Campbell, the dispute arose after the defense filed a motion addressing ballistic evidence analyzed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
“The defense had filed a motion essentially trying to characterize some ballistic evidence from the ATF,” Campbell explained.
Campbell said the defense argued that the ATF determined a bullet recovered from the crime scene did not match a firearm recovered during the investigation.
According to Campbell, Ballard believed that characterization was inaccurate and sought to clarify the agency’s findings.
“What the prosecutor said was, ‘Look, that’s misleading. The ATF didn’t say it didn’t match. They said they’re not able to determine right now if it matches, which is a big difference,’” Campbell said.
Campbell added that Ballard then contacted multiple media organizations in an effort to explain that distinction.
One of those public comments came during an interview with TMZ in March.
“We have ample evidence to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that Tyler Robinson committed this murder, and we will present some of the evidence at the upcoming preliminary hearing — and then we will present all of that evidence at trial,” Ballard told the outlet.
Defense attorneys argued that Ballard’s statements could prejudice the jury pool and asked Judge Graf to remove the death penalty as a possible punishment if Robinson is ultimately convicted.
The judge, however, declined to grant that request.
According to Campbell, Judge Graf concluded that while Ballard had violated the court’s order by speaking to the media, the conduct did not justify removing capital punishment as a sentencing option.
“The judge said, ‘I’m not going that far. I’m not going to do that. That would require much, much more egregious type of violation,’” Campbell reported.
As a result, the death penalty remains a possible sentence if the case proceeds to a penalty phase following a conviction.
The contempt ruling represents a significant development in the closely watched prosecution, but it does not alter the underlying murder charge against Robinson or the potential penalties he could face.
The case continues to move forward in Utah, with Robinson still awaiting further proceedings and having not yet entered a plea to the murder charge.
[READ MORE: Massie Warns GOP Faces ‘Absolute Shellacking’ in Midterms if Party Doesn’t ‘Wake Up’]
