The White House on Friday rolled out a new set of policy recommendations for artificial intelligence, making clear that its vision for the rapidly evolving technology hinges on one central idea: Washington, not the states, should take the lead.
In a four-page framework sent to Congress, the administration argued that any meaningful national AI strategy “can succeed only” if it avoids a patchwork of conflicting state laws. The proposal outlines seven priorities, including strengthening protections for children online, safeguarding free speech, and accelerating the development of AI infrastructure.
The recommendations follow a December executive order from President Donald Trump aimed at limiting states’ authority to regulate AI while pushing for a stronger federal role. Now, the White House is urging lawmakers to turn that vision into legislation—no small task in a Congress that has struggled for years to find consensus on both artificial intelligence and online safety for children.
The timing is notable. With the 2026 midterm elections approaching, concerns about AI—ranging from its impact on families to the strain of energy-hungry data centers—are rising among voters. The administration acknowledged that uncertainty, noting that many Americans are worried about how the technology could affect their children’s well-being and even their monthly electricity bills.
On the issue of online safety, the framework calls on Congress to build on existing efforts, including Sen. Ted Cruz’s Take it Down Act, which criminalized the distribution of nonconsensual sexually explicit deepfake content. The White House is pushing for new rules that would give parents stronger tools to monitor children’s online activity, along with age verification systems designed to be both effective and protective of privacy—an issue that has already sparked heated debate on Capitol Hill.
Interestingly, while the administration is advocating for federal dominance in most areas of AI policy, it stops short of overriding state laws when it comes to protecting children. The framework explicitly supports allowing states to continue enforcing their own laws related to online safety and sexual abuse material, even when AI is involved.
At the same time, the White House is taking aim at the potential economic fallout from AI’s rapid expansion. It is urging Congress to ensure that ratepayers are not saddled with higher electricity costs tied to the construction and operation of massive data centers. The plan also calls for streamlining federal permitting to speed up infrastructure development—an effort likely to appeal to industry leaders but one that could raise concerns about oversight.
Still, the most contentious piece of the proposal remains federal preemption. The administration, backed by many in the tech sector, argues that a unified national standard would remove “undue burdens” on innovation and help the United States stay competitive globally. Critics within the GOP, however, have already resisted similar efforts, with lawmakers failing twice last year to pass a 10-year moratorium on state-level AI regulations.
Beyond regulatory structure, the framework also touches on intellectual property rights—an area already fueling lawsuits against major AI companies—and calls for protections against censorship, a top concern among conservatives.
Despite the urgency emphasized by the White House, the path forward is uncertain. Deep divisions, narrow majorities, and competing priorities mean any comprehensive AI legislation faces an uphill climb.
Even so, House Speaker Mike Johnson, Majority Whip Steve Scalise, and key Republican committee chairs signaled a willingness to work across the aisle, emphasizing that AI’s potential to improve American life—and the need to outpace China—demands action.
Yet as Washington debates how best to harness this powerful technology, the broader challenge remains familiar: balancing innovation, costs, and individual freedoms without rushing headlong into unintended consequences.
[READ MORE: Comey Called To Testify To Grand Jury]
