The Texas American Federation of Teachers announced Tuesday it is suing the Texas Education Agency over investigations into school officials accused of posting “inappropriate” comments online after the assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, arguing the state crossed a constitutional line.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court, claims the state’s actions violated the First Amendment rights of hundreds of educators whose social media activity came under scrutiny after Kirk was killed during a college campus event in September.
According to the union, the Texas Education Agency’s decision to launch broad investigations triggered what it describes as a wave of retaliation against teachers across the state.
In its complaint, the Texas American Federation of Teachers said a letter sent by the Texas Education Agency announcing the investigations “unleashed a wave of retaliation and disciplinary actions against teachers.” The union alleges that educators were reprimanded, placed on administrative leave and, in some cases, fired based on their online speech.
State officials have previously argued that the teachers under investigation violated the Texas code of ethics for educators. The union, however, says the probes were driven by an “impermissibly vague” and overly broad policy that gives bureaucrats too much discretion and chills lawful expression.
According to the lawsuit, the investigations went far beyond addressing legitimate concerns and instead punished teachers for expressing opinions, even when those views were posted on personal social media accounts. The union argues that such enforcement tramples constitutional protections and creates a climate of fear inside schools.
“Somewhere and somehow, our state’s leaders lost their way,” said Zeph Capo, president of the Texas American Federation of Teachers. Capo accused state leaders of prioritizing political optics over basic rights, claiming that a small group of politicians and bureaucrats saw an opportunity to score points at the expense of educators.
Capo said the consequences for teachers have been severe. According to the union, educators were subjected not only to disciplinary measures, but also to doxxing and death threats, all while facing the prospect of losing their careers. The lawsuit claims the uncertainty surrounding the investigations has left teachers and their families fearful about their livelihoods and reputations.
“Educators and their families are afraid that they’ll lose everything,” Capo said, arguing that the state’s actions undermine the mission of teachers to foster critical thinking in classrooms.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas and seeks to halt what the union describes as unconstitutional enforcement actions by the Texas Education Agency. While the complaint centers on free speech, critics of the union argue the state has a responsibility to ensure educators uphold professional standards, particularly following the murder of a prominent public figure.
The case highlights a growing tension in Texas between state authorities and public-sector unions over the limits of acceptable speech and the role of educators in politically charged moments. Supporters of the investigations say the state cannot ignore comments that may glorify or excuse violence, while the union insists the response went too far and punished lawful expression.
As the lawsuit moves forward, it sets the stage for a high-profile legal battle over where free speech ends and professional responsibility begins in public schools. With emotions still raw following the killing of Charlie Kirk, the outcome could shape how Texas and other states handle politically sensitive speech by educators in the future.
[READ MORE: Trump Praises Safer Washington, Booming Restaurants as National Guard Presence Wins GOP Applause]
