Politico senior legal affairs reporter Josh Gerstein ignited a firestorm online this week after suggesting that a YouTuber investigating the massive Somali fraud scandal in Minnesota could have been legally shot simply for knocking on doors.
The controversy began with a Monday night post on X in which Gerstein appeared to reference YouTuber Nick Shirley, whose video investigation into alleged fraud at Somali-run daycare centers has gone viral and drawn national attention. Shirley’s reporting has highlighted empty facilities and evasive answers from staff, raising fresh questions about how deeply fraud may run in the state.
“At some point, the amateur effort to knock on doors of home daycares intersects with robust stand-your-ground laws,” Gerstein wrote, prompting immediate backlash. Critics across the ideological spectrum accused the Politico reporter of misrepresenting self-defense laws and appearing hostile toward independent investigative journalism.
At some point, the amateur effort to knock on doors of home daycares intersects with robust stand-your-ground laws
— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) December 30, 2025
Legal experts and journalists were quick to push back, saying Gerstein’s claim distorted the meaning of stand-your-ground statutes. Mediaite reporter Sarah Rumpf pointed out that even in states with strong self-defense laws, such as Florida, the standard is clear. A person must reasonably believe the use of force is necessary to prevent death or serious harm. A reporter knocking on a door and asking questions does not meet that threshold, Rumpf noted, and is not considered unlawful or forcible entry.
Others argued the comment revealed a troubling double standard when it comes to who is allowed to investigate sensitive stories. National Review’s Dan McLaughlin observed that calls to justify violence against journalists tend to surface only when the reporting challenges narratives the national press has ignored or avoided. McLaughlin’s colleague Jeff Blehar took the criticism further, sarcastically suggesting that Gerstein’s logic implied it would be better to silence journalists than allow scrutiny of a multibillion-dollar fraud scandal.
Reason editor Robby Soave also weighed in, calling Gerstein’s post false and dangerous. Soave explained that stand-your-ground laws do not grant permission to shoot people for knocking on a door. Rather, they remove the duty to retreat when someone is under attack on their own property. Knocking on the door of a daycare or other public-facing facility, he said, is plainly not an attack.
Fox News contributor David Marcus echoed that sentiment, bluntly questioning whether Gerstein was advising people to shoot reporters for doing basic investigative work. Marcus said the suggestion crossed a line and reflected a disturbing attitude toward independent reporting.
The uproar comes as Shirley’s investigation continues to gain traction. His video has racked up tens of millions of views and helped reignite scrutiny of fraud allegations in Minnesota, where federal officials have estimated losses could reach into the billions. Critics have noted that Shirley’s work has drawn more attention to the issue than coverage from many mainstream outlets.
Gerstein’s remark also fueled broader criticism of legacy media, with commentators arguing that independent journalists are being attacked for pursuing stories that major news organizations failed to cover aggressively. To many observers, the backlash underscored growing frustration with what they see as media gatekeeping and hostility toward outsider reporting.
While Gerstein did not explicitly call for violence, critics said the implication of his post was reckless and legally unsound. The consensus among those responding was clear: stand-your-ground laws do not justify shooting someone for knocking on a door, and suggesting otherwise not only misleads the public but risks normalizing threats against journalists doing their jobs.
As the Minnesota fraud scandal continues to unfold, the episode has become a flashpoint in a larger debate over press freedom, legal literacy, and whether establishment media figures are more interested in protecting narratives than confronting uncomfortable facts.
[READ MORE: Baier Presses Zelenskyy on Corruption as U.S. Funding for Ukraine Rolls On]
