Elon Musk recently shared his skepticism about the likelihood of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky facing jail time, labeling him a corrupt leader and a “war profiteer.”
In a series of tweets, Musk criticized Zelensky’s handling of the ongoing conflict with Russia, suggesting that the war serves the president’s interests more than those of the Ukrainian people.
This commentary followed former President Donald Trump’s sharp critique of Zelensky, who had claimed that the end of the war was still a long way off.
Trump condemned Zelensky’s remarks, asserting that they undermine the urgency for peace and demonstrate a reliance on American support to maintain his position.
Zelensky wants a forever war, a never-ending graft meat grinder. This is evil. https://t.co/FVaEkIm7Gq
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 3, 2025
Musk echoed this sentiment, describing Zelensky’s desire for a prolonged conflict as “evil.” He pointed out that Zelensky might fear losing power if the war were to conclude, a concern that resonates with many observers of the political landscape.
In a bold proposal, Musk suggested offering Zelensky amnesty in a neutral country to facilitate a peaceful transition back to democracy in Ukraine.
While this idea may seem controversial, it reflects Musk’s pragmatic approach to resolving complex geopolitical issues.
His willingness to entertain unconventional solutions underscores a growing frustration with the status quo.
Musk’s comments highlight a significant divergence from Zelensky’s narrative, especially as Trump increasingly labels him a dictator.
This evolving dialogue raises important questions about U.S.-Ukraine relations and the future of leadership in conflict zones. By advocating for accountability and change, Musk positions himself as a voice for reason in a tumultuous political environment.
[READ MORE: Canadian Leader Threatens to Cut Off Electricity Supply to the U.S.]
