A federal judge has how reportedly dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Democratic National Committee and congressional Democrats that sought to challenge an executive order from President Donald Trump, marking a legal win for the administration in an ongoing battle over the limits of presidential authority.
The lawsuit centered on an executive order directing federal agencies to align their legal interpretations with those of the president or the attorney general.
The plaintiffs argued that the directive posed a threat to the independence of the Federal Election Commission, raising concerns that it could allow undue political influence over the body tasked with enforcing campaign finance laws.
However, U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ruled that the plaintiffs had not demonstrated any concrete harm resulting from the order.
He noted that the FEC had not changed its policies or practices in response and had received no instructions from the White House. Without evidence of actual interference or imminent risk, the court found the claims to be speculative.
In his ruling, Judge Ali made clear that while concerns about executive overreach are legitimate, courts require evidence of specific and immediate impact to intervene.
He added that the plaintiffs are free to return to court if future actions by the administration directly affect the FEC’s autonomy.
The lawsuit, filed earlier this year, was the first brought by national Democratic entities against a Trump executive order during his second term.
They contended that the order blurred the lines between the White House and independent regulatory bodies, setting a dangerous precedent that could politicize institutions designed to operate at arm’s length from presidential control.
Legal analysts had noted that the case could set the tone for future challenges to Trump’s approach to the federal bureaucracy.
While the judge’s dismissal ends this particular legal battle, it leaves the broader question of agency independence unresolved, particularly as Trump continues to assert greater control over the administrative state.
The administration has defended the order as a clarification of executive authority and has denied any intent to interfere with independent agencies.
Officials argue that ensuring uniform legal interpretation across the executive branch is a matter of good governance, not political maneuvering.
The ruling is expected to limit near-term challenges to the executive order, but Democrats have indicated they will continue to monitor developments at the FEC and other agencies.
[READ MORE: US Army Hits Major Goal]
