A federal judge has now reportedly ruled in favor of the Trump administration, allowing it to move forward with placing over 2,000 U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) employees on administrative leave. This decision applies to both domestic and internationally stationed personnel.
The ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, lifts a previous temporary restraining order that had halted the administration’s efforts. The judge declined to issue a long-term injunction that would have kept the employees in their positions.
The case stems from the administration’s broader efforts to reshape foreign aid policies. USAID, responsible for distributing humanitarian assistance worldwide, has been a focal point of the administration’s efforts to reassess spending. The White House argues that these actions are necessary to align foreign aid with national interests, but critics view them as an attempt to undermine the agency’s mission.
Government employee unions, along with legal advocacy group Democracy Forward, have opposed the move, arguing that it violates constitutional principles.
They contend that removing thousands of personnel effectively dismantles an agency established and funded by Congress. They also raise concerns about the disruption of essential programs that provide aid to vulnerable populations globally.
The ruling ensures that USAID personnel stationed abroad will continue receiving protection from U.S. security forces while on leave. However, this decision does not address the long-term implications for the agency’s operations.
The administration has faced multiple legal challenges related to its handling of foreign aid. Following an executive order issued by President Trump, a 90-day freeze on all foreign aid was implemented, causing significant disruptions.
The suspension of contracts and the closure of USAID’s Washington headquarters have further complicated operations. Courts have intervened in some cases, ordering the resumption of payments to contractors and grant recipients. However, this ruling marks a legal victory for the administration’s broader agenda.
[READ MORE: AP Sues Trump White House Over Loss of Press Privileges]
