Fox News anchor Bret Baier challenged a key claim from President Donald Trump on Thursday night, raising questions about the broader economic impact of tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz and the ongoing conflict with Iran.
During an interview on Special Report, Baier confronted House Speaker Mike Johnson with the president’s repeated assertion that the United States does not “need” the strategically vital waterway. Trump has made that argument in recent days, including at a Cabinet meeting, as he has pushed for other nations to take a more active role in securing the strait.
Baier, however, pointed to a more complicated reality—one that reflects how interconnected global markets remain, even for an energy-producing nation like the United States.
Citing current data, Baier noted that the national average for gas prices has climbed to $3.98 per gallon, up from $2.98 just a month ago and $3.15 a year earlier. While acknowledging that the U.S. may not rely heavily on oil passing directly through the Strait of Hormuz, he emphasized that many other countries do—and that dependence carries consequences for American consumers.
Global trade, Baier suggested, does not operate in isolation. When key shipping routes are disrupted or threatened, the ripple effects can reach far beyond the region, influencing the cost of goods and energy worldwide. He also highlighted that roughly half of the world’s urea exports—an essential component of fertilizer—pass through the strait, making the issue particularly significant for American farmers.
Johnson agreed with that assessment, acknowledging that the situation presents real concerns. “We’re concerned,” he said, pointing to the challenges already facing the agricultural sector. Farmers, he noted, are navigating a difficult environment, and rising input costs—particularly for fuel and fertilizer—only add to the strain.
The speaker expressed hope that stabilizing the situation in the strait could help bring relief. “We can get control back over the price of fertilizer, the price of fuel, if we get that Strait straightened out,” Johnson said, underscoring the importance of resolving the issue sooner rather than later.
At the same time, Johnson sought to reconcile Trump’s comments with the broader economic picture. He suggested that while the president’s statement about U.S. energy independence may hold some truth, it does not negate the wider effects of global market disruptions.
“What the president said is not inaccurate,” Johnson said, adding that multiple realities can coexist. Even if the U.S. is less directly dependent on the strait for oil, the interconnected nature of international trade means that instability in one region can still drive up costs at home.
Johnson also pointed to the role of allies and regional partners, noting that countries in the Middle East—as well as NATO allies—have a direct stake in maintaining stability in the waterway. Their involvement, he suggested, could be key to resolving the situation and restoring balance to global markets.
The exchange highlighted a tension that often emerges during international conflicts: the gap between strategic messaging and economic reality. While political leaders may emphasize strength and independence, the practical effects of instability—higher prices, strained industries, and uncertain supply chains—can be harder to dismiss.
As the situation continues to unfold, the discussion serves as a reminder that even distant conflicts can carry tangible consequences at home, particularly when vital trade routes and global commodities are involved.
[READ MORE: Lindell Interview at CPAC Disrupted by Apparent Lawsuit Service in On-Air Moment]
