In a developing story surrounding the Pentagon’s investigation into leaks, advisers to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have reportedly raised serious concerns about the use of illegal wiretaps to justify the firings of three senior aides.
The situation escalated following the abrupt dismissal of Dan Caldwell, Darin Selnick, and Colin Carroll, who were let go in mid-April amid an inquiry into unauthorized disclosures related to sensitive military operations.
The investigation had focused on leaks concerning U.S. military strategies, including plans for retaking the Panama Canal and movements of aircraft carriers in the Middle East.
All three aides denied any wrongdoing, with Caldwell publicly claiming he had been framed shortly after his dismissal during an appearance on Tucker Carlson Tonight.
A report from The Guardian has since revealed troubling allegations that the aides may have been subjected to warrantless wiretaps by the National Security Agency (NSA).
Such actions, if confirmed, could be unconstitutional and could possibly represent a significant scandal, eclipsing the initial concerns over the leaks themselves.
Advisers close to Hegseth were reportedly alarmed by these claims, which were disseminated by Hegseth’s personal attorney, Tim Parlatore, who was overseeing the investigation.
Despite the gravity of the allegations, sources indicated that the claims of wiretapping were unsubstantiated. This has further exacerbated a breakdown in trust between the Pentagon and the White House.
One adviser to President Donald Trump expressed skepticism regarding the culpability of the fired aides, suggesting that the investigation may have been a maneuver to eliminate personnel involved in internal conflicts with Hegseth’s initial chief of staff, Joe Kasper.
The incident has highlighted the ongoing tensions within the Trump administration, particularly concerning the handling of leaks and internal dissent.
As the political landscape continues to shift, the implications of these allegations could reverberate beyond the Pentagon, potentially affecting broader perceptions of governance within the administration.
The controversy also raises critical questions about the ethical boundaries of investigations into leaks, especially in the context of national security.
As the Pentagon navigates this tumultuous period, the focus will likely remain on the integrity of its processes and the accountability of those at the highest levels of leadership.
With the fallout from this incident still unfolding, it remains to be seen how the administration will address these allegations and restore confidence among its ranks.
As leaks continue to be a contentious issue in Washington, the relationship between the Pentagon and the White House may be tested further in the days ahead.
[READ MORE: Trump Faces Lawsuit Over Order Targeting NPR Funding]
