The Trump administration has withdrawn controversial subpoenas issued to journalists at The New York Times after the move sparked significant criticism and prompted a legal challenge from the newspaper.
Earlier this month, the Department of Justice issued subpoenas seeking phone records and demanding grand jury testimony from Times reporters who had covered concerns surrounding the security capabilities of the Air Force One aircraft that President Donald Trump received from Qatar.
The subpoenas quickly became the focus of widespread concern among First Amendment advocates, who viewed the action as raising serious press freedom issues. The move also drew an immediate and forceful response from The New York Times, which filed a motion asking the court to quash the subpoenas.
The dispute reached a key moment on Thursday during a hearing in U.S. District Court, where Judge Arun Subramanian, a Biden appointee, closely questioned Justice Department officials while considering the newspaper’s request to block the subpoenas.
Following the hearing and the judge’s extensive questioning, the Justice Department announced it would withdraw the subpoenas, effectively ending its effort to obtain the requested records and testimony from the Times journalists.
According to The New York Times, Sean Buckley, one of the highest-ranking officials in the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan, informed the court of the government’s decision.
“The government is prepared to unilaterally withdraw the subpoenas at this time,” Buckley said during the hearing in U.S. District Court.
The DOJ’s reversal came after the newspaper had sought judicial intervention to prevent enforcement of the subpoenas. The legal battle centered on demands for journalists’ phone records as well as their appearance before a grand jury in connection with reporting on the Air Force One aircraft obtained from Qatar.
The initial decision to issue the subpoenas generated immediate backlash from supporters of press protections, who warned that compelling reporters to turn over records or testify before a grand jury could have implications for journalistic independence and the free flow of information.
The New York Times responded by challenging the subpoenas in court, arguing they should not be enforced. That legal challenge culminated in Thursday’s hearing before Judge Subramanian, where the Justice Department ultimately changed course.
With the government now withdrawing the subpoenas, the dispute appears to have come to an end without the court ruling on the newspaper’s motion to quash.
The Justice Department’s decision marks a significant reversal from its earlier effort to obtain information from the Times journalists regarding their reporting on the security capabilities of the Air Force One aircraft provided to President Trump by Qatar.
For now, the administration has stepped back from pursuing the subpoenas, concluding the legal fight after announcing in federal court that it was prepared to withdraw them unilaterally.
[READ MORE: Schumer Says Senate Democrats Holding ‘Doomsday’ Election Exercises Ahead of Midterms]
